5 item(s) mentioning PSA International in the rolling archive, newest first.
Baltic Hub, the Gdansk container terminal 40%-owned by PSA International, has secured a PLN 220.6m EU grant toward electrification and modernisation of the terminal.
Why is this an opportunity for P&M: EU-funded electrification at a PSA-owned Gdansk terminal — crane cable-reel and shore-power scope at a top-tier operator.
PSA International is investing in a new deep-sea container terminal at Hai Phong (Lach Huyen) in northern Vietnam, part of a wave of operator investment reshaping Southeast Asian logistics.
Why is this an opportunity for P&M: a PSA greenfield deep-water terminal in Vietnam opens crane-electrification and automated-mooring attach at an early stage.
PSA Halifax has added a pair of remotely operated rail-mounted gantry cranes to its container terminal in Nova Scotia, advancing the automation programme at one of PSA International's North Atlantic gateways.
Why is this an opportunity for P&M: New remotely operated RMG pair at PSA Halifax — direct cable-reel and crane-electrification scope at a top-tier global terminal operator.
PSA International completed an investment in Xiamen Container Terminal Group (8 terminals, ~20m TEU designed capacity) and increased its stake in the Xiamen Port Intermodal Logistics Hub. Strengthens PSA's Fujian/China footprint.
Why is this an opportunity for P&M: PSA's deepening China footprint widens the addressable installed base for crane-side equipment at a named customer.
PSA closed its investment in Xiamen Container Terminal Group on 1 May, covering eight terminals of c.20m TEU designed capacity, and increased its stake in the Xiamen Port Intermodal Logistics Hub. PSA framed Fujian as a Node-to-Network strategic hub anchored alongside its existing Fuzhou venture.
Why it matters for P&M: PSA enlarging mainland China exposure increases the relevance of competitor Ningbo Weilong in our reference and account planning. PSA is a notable global customer where Cavotec footprint outside Asia is stronger; the Chinese consolidation is a reminder to clarify which corporate window (Singapore HQ vs Xiamen JV) decides equipment specifications.
This link goes to , a source outside the trusted list. Are you sure you want to continue?